MONGOSOFT, INC. v. ORACLE CORP.

No. 02-cv-545-SM.

482 F.Supp.2d 179 (2007)

2007 DNH 040

MANGOSOFT, INC. and Mangosoft Corporation, Plaintiffs v. ORACLE CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire.

March 28, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alexander J. Walker, Danielle Leah Pacik, Devine Millimet & Branch PA, Manchester, NH, Paul J. Hayes, Robert R. Gilman, Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo PC, Boston, MA, for Plaintiffs.

Eugene Y. Mar, Leeron G. Kalay, Matthew D. Powers, Paul T. Ehrlich, Weil Gotshal & Manges, Matthew M. Sarboraria, Oracle Corporation, Redwood Shores, CA, Martha Van Oot, Orr & Reno Pa, Concord, NH, for Defendant.


ORDER

McAULIFFE, Chief Judge.

This is a suit for patent infringement, in which Mangosoft, Inc. and Mangosoft Corporation (collectively, "Mangosoft") claim that Oracle Corporation is selling software that infringes United States Patent No. 6,148,377 ("the '377 patent").1 By prior order, the court held that the Oracle products identified by Mangosoft do not infringe the '377 patent. As to Oracle's counterclaim of patent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases