MORIN v. HARRELL

No. 79971-7.

164 P.3d 495 (2007)

Melanie MORIN, Appellant, v. Clarence HARRELL & Hazel Harrell, husband and wife and their marital community, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Decided August 9, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Guyton Simmons, Simmons Law PLLC, Bellevue, WA, for Appellant.

Douglas Warr Nicholson, Cone Gilreath Ellis Cole & Anderson, Ellensburg, WA, for Respondents.

Robert H. Lavitt, Schwerin Campbell Barnard & Iglitzin LLP, Seattle, WA, for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Service Employees International Union 775.

Anastasia R. Sandstrom, Attorney General's Office, Seattle, WA, Carol A. Murphy, Attorney General's Office, Olympia, WA, for Amicus Curiae on behalf of State of Washington.


J.M. JOHNSON, J.

¶ 1 Article II, section 19 of our constitution provides that "[n]o bill shall embrace more than one subject" and requires that the subject "shall be expressed in the title."1 Violation of either the single subject rule or the subject in title rule exposes a law to constitutional challenge.2 However, such a challenge is precluded when the allegedly constitutionally infirm legislation has...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases