CENTENE PLAZA REDEVELOPMENT CORP. v. MINT PROPS.

No. SC 88487.

225 S.W.3d 431 (2007)

CENTENE PLAZA REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Respondent, v. MINT PROPERTIES, et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.

June 12, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerard T. Carmody, Kevin M. Cushing, Teresa Dale Pupillo, Carmody MacDonald, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for Appellants.

Thomas B. Weaver, James E. Mello, Jeffery T. McPherson, Timothy J. Tryniecki, Jovita M. Foster, Armstrong Teasdale, LLP, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.

Kevin M. O'Keefe, Paul Martin, Clayton, MO, City of Clayton, for Amicus Curiae.

Patricia A. Hageman, City of St. Louis Counselor, Patricia Redington, St. Louis County Counselor, Michael A. Gross, Counsel for MO Municipal League, St. Louis, MO, Albert A. Riederer, Jackson County Special Counselor, Kansas City, MO, Missouri Municipal League, City of St. Louis, Missouri, Jackson County, Missouri and St. Louis County, Missouri, for Amicus Curiae.


PER CURIAM.1

Overview

The city of Clayton solicited redevelopment plans for one block of Forsyth Boulevard. Centene Plaza Redevelopment Corporation submitted the plan approved by Clayton, which included condemnation authority. When Centene failed to reach agreement with all the property owners to acquire the properties, it filed this condemnation action. Mint Properties and several other defendants resisted the condemnation on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases