Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion under CPLR 4404 (a) in setting aside the jury verdict and granting a new trial to the defendant Rama Koslowe (hereinafter the defendant) based on the pervasive inflammatory and improper summation remarks of counsel for the plaintiff (see Pagano v Murray,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.