1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 244 S.W.3d
  5. 244 S.W.3d 370 (2007)
 

ROGERS v. ALEXANDER

No. 05-05-00233-CV.

244 S.W.3d 370 (2007)

James O. ROGERS, William M. Burmeister, Conservative Care, Inc., and Care Affiliates, Inc., Appellants, v. Daniel ALEXANDER, Leslie Alexander, and Judith Pucci, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.

June 29, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Deborah G. Hankinson, Law Office of Deborah G. Hankinson, James David Brown, Winstead Sechrest & Minick, Dallas, Christopher A. Kalis, Law Offices of Christopher Kalis, Plano, for Appellants.

Peter Dermot Marketos, Haynes & Boone, L.L.P., Scott A. Scher, Law Office of Scott A. Scher, Dallas, for Appellees.

Before Justices BRIDGES, FRANCIS, and LANG-MIERS.

OPINION

Opinion by Justice BRIDGES.

James O. Rogers, William M. Burmeister, Conservative Care, Inc., and Care Affiliates, Inc., appeal the trial court's judgment, following a jury trial, in favor of Daniel Alexander, Leslie Alexander, and Judith Pucci. In nineteen issues, appellants argue (1) there is no evidence to support an award of damages on any of appellees' claims; (2) appellees' expert witness was unqualified, unreliable, and used faulty damage models...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases