The court mentioned postrelease supervision (PRS) during the plea proceeding, and it set forth the applicable mandatory five-year term of PRS in the worksheet that the court personally signed, as well as in the commitment sheet. Defendant's constitutional challenge to the fact that the court did not mention PRS in its oral pronouncement of sentence is unpreserved (see People v Thomas,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. RIVERA
36 A.D.3d 563 (2007)
827 N.Y.S.2d 659
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWIN RIVERA, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided January 30, 2007.
Decided January 30, 2007.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.