1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 160 P.3d
  5. 160 P.3d 437 (2007)
 

MYERS v. QWEST

No. 32852.

160 P.3d 437 (2007)

Arthur MYERS, Claimant-Appellant, v. QWEST, Employer, and Reliance National Indemnity Company, Surety, Defendants-Respondents.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, May 2007 Term.

May 23, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur Myers, appellant pro se.

Moore & Baskin, LLP, Boise, for respondent. Thomas P. Baskin argued.

EISMANN, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order denying a worker's compensation claim due to the claimant's failure to comply with the notice and claim requirements of Idaho Code § 72-448. We affirm.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Arthur Myers was a long-time employee of Quest and its predecessors. While working on February 9, 1998, Myers became anxious and experienced shortness of breath. He left work and never returned. On August 15, 2001...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases