Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The defendant argues that the plaintiff was not entitled to relief in this action because of "unclean hands." He further contends that the Supreme Court failed to follow the procedures for partition actions as articulated in RPAPL article 9, including the right to a jury trial pursuant to RPAPL 907 (2). In addition, the defendant argues that, contrary to the plaintiff's contention, a stipulation...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
