VAN KRUININGEN v. PLAN B, LLC

No. 3:05cv1528 (JBA).

485 F.Supp.2d 92 (2007)

Daniel VAN KRUININGEN and Kimberly Chatterton, Plaintiffs, v. PLAN B, LLC d/b/a Mohegan After Dark, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

May 1, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nicole M. Rothgeb, Thomas W. Meiklejohn, Livingston, Adler, Pulda, Meiklejohn & Kelly, Hartford, CT, for Plaintiffs.

Andrew Houlding, Rome McGuigan Sabanosh, Hartford, CT, for Defendant.


RULING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS [DOC. # 74]

ARTERTON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Daniel Van Kruiningen and Kimberly Chatterton initiated this action against their former employer Plan B, L.L.C. d/b/a Mohegan After Dark ("After Dark") following their termination from After Dark on January 13, 2004, alleging termination in retaliation for their reporting of activity they believed constituted sexual harassment in violation of Title...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases