STATE v. BEAMAN

C033023CR; A125644.

171 P.3d 402 (2007)

216 Or. App. 181

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Steven Allan BEAMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 7, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patrick M. Ebbett and Chilton, Ebbett & Rohr, LLC, filed the opening brief for appellant. Steven A. Beaman filed the supplemental brief pro se.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Janet A. Metcalf, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and ROSENBLUM, Judges.


PER CURIAM.

After a trial to the court, defendant was convicted of numerous crimes stemming from a series of burglaries. On appeal, he argues that the trial court violated his federal Confrontation Clause rights by admitting evidence of statements made by an accomplice who did not testify.1 The state concedes that the trial court erred, and we accept that concession. See Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases