STATE v. GUM

No. 1 CA-CR 06-0683 PRPC.

153 P.3d 418 (2007)

STATE of Arizona, Respondent, v. Edward Harry GUM, Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department D.

March 6, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Terry Goddard, Attorney General By Randall M. Howe, Chief Counsel, Criminal Appeals Section, Phoenix, and Sheila Sullivan Polk, Yavapai County Attorney By Dennis M. McGrane, Deputy County Attorney, Prescott, Attorneys for Respondent.

Sherman Jensen, P.C. By Sherman Jensen, Prescott, Attorney for Petitioner.


OPINION

WINTHROP, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Petitioner Edward Harry Gum seeks review of the trial court's order denying post-conviction relief. For the reasons that follow, we grant review but deny relief. We hold that, because the statute of limitations in effect at the time of the commission of Gum's acts had not expired when the legislature extended the statute of limitations, Gum's prosecution was not time-barred.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases