PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his convictions for first-degree failure to appear, ORS 162.205, and second-degree failure to appear, ORS 162.195. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal on the ground that the evidence did not establish that he had been "released from custody" as that term is used in ORS 162.205(1)(a) and ORS 162.195(1)(a). The state concedes that, under our reasoning in State v. Ford,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.