1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 496 F.Supp.2d
  5. 496 F.Supp.2d 70 (2007)
 

CLEMENTS v. GONZALES

Civil Action No. 06-1809 (RBW).

496 F.Supp.2d 70 (2007)

Clyde CLEMENTS, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Alberto GONZALES, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

June 27, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clyde E. Clements, Jr., Lynchburg, VA, Pro se.

Andrea McBarnette, U.S. Attorney's Office, Washington, DC, for Defendants.

ORDER

WALTON, District Judge.

On October 19, 2006, Clyde E. Clements, Jr. ("the plaintiff'), acting pro se, brought this action against the United States Supreme Court ("the defendant") as a challenge to the validity of Supreme Court Rules 10 and 20. 1, which provide that the granting of petitions for writs of certiorari and mandamus are "not a matter of right, but of judicial discretion."

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases