PAJARO VALLEY WATER MGMT. AGENCY v. AMRHEIN

No. H027817.

59 Cal.Rptr.3d 484 (2007)

150 Cal.App.4th 1364

PAJARO VALLEY WATER MGMT. AGENCY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Ray AMRHEIN et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeal of California, Sixth District.

May 21, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Johnson & James, Robert K. Johnson, Aptos, for Defendants and Appellants Ray Amrhein et al.

Harold Griffith, Amicus Curiae for Appellants Ray Amrhein et al.

Maria Luisa Menchaca, Amicus Curiae for Appellants Fair Political Practices Commission.

Nossman, Guthner, Know & Elliott, Stephen N. Roberts, Nicole A. Tutt, Sophie N. Froelich, San Francisco, for Plaintiff and Respondent Pajaro Valley Water Management Agency.

San Diego County Water Authority, Daniel S. Hentschke, General Counsel, Oceanside, Amicus Curiae for Respondent Association of California Water Agencies.


RUSHING, P.J.

Plaintiff and respondent Pajaro Valley Water Management Agency (Agency) brought this validation proceeding to ascertain the validity of its 2003 ordinance increasing the groundwater augmentation fee to be charged to operators of wells within its jurisdiction. Defendants and appellants Ray Amrhein, Guy George, Mark Pista, San Andreas Mutual Water Company, Patrick Layhee, and John Sheffield (Objectors) appeared in opposition to the requested decree. After...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases