VINCEP v. YAMHILL COUNTY

2006157; A135362.

171 P.3d 368 (2007)

215 Or. App. 414

VINCEP, Domaine Drouhin, and Jason Lett, Petitioners Cross-Respondents, and Ilsa Perse, Respondent, v. YAMHILL COUNTY, Respondent, and David Kahn and The Hazel E. Timmons Trust, Respondents Cross-Petitioners.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 10, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William K. Kabeiseman, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners-cross-respondents. With him on the briefs were Edward J. Sullivan, Carrie A. Richter, and Garvey Schubert Barer.

Roger A. Alfred, Portland, argued the cause for respondents-cross-petitioners. With him on the brief were Michael C. Robinson, Corinne Sam, and Perkins Coie LLP.

No appearance for respondent Ilsa Perse.

No appearance for respondent Yamhill County.

Before WOLLHEIM, Presiding Judge, and BREWER, Chief Judge, and SERCOMBE, Judge.


SERCOMBE, J.

Petitioners (opponents of the land use decision under review) and cross-petitioners (applicants for that land use decision) seek review of an opinion and order of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA). LUBA remanded a county ordinance that approved comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance amendments to allow placement of a 50-room luxury hotel in an agricultural area. LUBA concluded that the county insufficiently...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases