CASTILLO v. EXPRESS ESCROW CO.

No. B186306.

53 Cal.Rptr.3d 485 (2007)

146 Cal.App.4th 1301

Ron CASTILLO et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. EXPRESS ESCROW CO., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Six.

January 18, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James E. Marino, Santa Barbara, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Michael G. Evans, Santa Clarita, and Lauren J. Udden, Santa Barbara, for Defendant and Respondent.


GILBERT, P.J.

Plaintiffs agree to purchase a mobile home. The defendant was the escrow agent for the sale. Health and Safety Code section 18035, subdivision (f), requires the escrow agent for a mobile home sale to hold funds in escrow upon receiving written notice of a dispute between the parties to the escrow.1 The escrow instructions provide that escrow shall close when all conditions have been met, unless the escrow company receives...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases