Even if we were to find that the court erred in excluding extrinsic evidence of an alleged prior inconsistent statement as to which appellant had cross-examined the victim, we would find the error to be harmless because there is no reasonable possibility that such error, if any, affected the court's fact-finding determination (see People v Crimmins,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF ELIO P.
36 A.D.3d 494 (2007)
831 N.Y.S.2d 112
In the Matter of ELIO P., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided January 18, 2007.
Decided January 18, 2007.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
