1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 38 A.D.3d
  5. 38 A.D.3d 481 (2007)
 

KIMM v. CHANG

38 A.D.3d 481 (2007)

833 N.Y.S.2d 429

MICHAEL S. KIMM, Appellant, v. DAVID CHANG et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided March 29, 2007.

The decision of the factfinder at a nonjury trial should not be disturbed on appeal unless it is obvious that the court's conclusion could not have been reached under any fair interpretation of the evidence, especially when those findings rest in large measure on considerations relating to the credibility of witnesses (see Claridge Gardens v Menotti, 160 A.D.2d 544 [1990]). We perceive no basis to disturb the trial court's determination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases