The determination was supported by substantial evidence that petitioner was guilty of misconduct, as indicated by his conviction of insurance fraud in the third degree. The fraud in question was not committed against the City or petitioner's departmental employer (see
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.