Plaintiff may not avail herself of the doctrine of equitable estoppel to preclude assertion of a statute of limitations defense because the alleged misrepresentation underlying the estoppel claim is one and the same as that forming the basis of the underlying substantive cause of action for negligence (see Rizk v Cohen,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PAUTIENIS v. LEGACY CAPITAL CORPORATION
36 A.D.3d 462 (2007)
828 N.Y.S.2d 336
BEATRICE PAUTIENIS, Appellant, v. LEGACY CAPITAL CORPORATION, Respondent, et al., Defendants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided January 11, 2007.
Decided January 11, 2007.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.