The court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress statements he made to the police and an assistant district attorney. During defendant's interactions with the police prior to the time that they administered Miranda warnings, defendant was not in custody because a reasonable innocent person in defendant's situation would have believed he was free to leave (see People v Yukl,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.