1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 172 P.3d
  5. 172 P.3d 302 (2007)
 

ANDERSON v. LANE COUNTY

2006236; A136646.

172 P.3d 302 (2007)

216 Or. App. 332

Clark ANDERSON, Lynn Anderson, Patricia Chomyn, Amy Donnelly, Martin Dreisbeich, Robert Emmons, Nena Lovinger, Tim Mcmahen, John A. Richardson, Jonny B. Watson, and Robert Winkler, Petitioners, v. LANE COUNTY and Carol Dennis, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 28, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jannett Wilson, Goal One Coalition, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners.

H. Andrew Clark argued the cause for respondent Lane County. With him on the brief were Stephen L. Vorhes and Lane County Office of Legal Counsel.

P. Steven Cornacchia, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent Carol Dennis. With him on the brief was Hershner, Hunter, LLP.

Before SCHUMAN, Presiding Judge, and BREWER, Chief Judge, and DEITS, Judge pro tempore.

PER CURIAM.

Lane County amended its Rural Comprehensive Plan to change the designation of certain property from "Forest Land" to "Marginal Land" pursuant to ORS 197.247(1)(a) (1991), and the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) affirmed. Petitioners seek judicial review, raising two assignments of error: First, they argue that LUBA erred in approving the county's use of 1983 prices in calculating the potential value of timber on that land; and, second, they argue that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases