OTERO v. 971 ONLY U, INC.


36 A.D.3d 430 (2007)

828 N.Y.S.2d 331

RICHARD OTERO et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. 971 ONLY U, INC., et al., Respondents, and FELIX A. RODRIGUEZ et al., Respondents-Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided January 9, 2007.


Plaintiffs failed to set forth any new facts not offered on the prior motion that would change the prior determination (CPLR 2221 [e] [2]). Even assuming they had presented new facts that were previously unavailable, they failed to demonstrate that plaintiff Richard Otero suffered a serious injury as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Plaintiffs' submission failed to explain a gap in treatment of more than a year, which is fatal to a claim of serious injury (Pommells...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases