ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS v. SHADDY

H04200; A130296.

164 P.3d 289 (2007)

212 Or. App. 320

ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent, v. Robert SHADDY, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner, and Department of Consumer and Business Services, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 25, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Benjamin M. Bloom, Medford, argued the cause for petitioner-cross-respondent. With him on the briefs was Hornecker, Cowling, Hassen & Heysell, L.L.P.

Christine Jensen, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent-cross-petitioner. With her on the opening brief was Malagon, Moore & Jensen. On the reply briefs was Christine Jensen.

Judy C. Lucas, Senior Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN and ORTEGA, Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Roseburg Forest Products (Roseburg), the self-insured employer of respondent Shaddy (claimant), seeks judicial review of an order by the Director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services (director) barring Roseburg from disputing whether elective surgery recommended by claimant's attending physician is excessive, inappropriate, or ineffectual. The order was based on OAR 436-010-0250(5), under which an insurer or self-insured employer must meet...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases