1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 65 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 65 Cal.Rptr.3d 372 (2007)
 

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF SAN DIEGO v. MESDAQ

Nos. D047927, D048490.

65 Cal.Rptr.3d 372 (2007)

154 Cal.App.4th 1111

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF the CITY OF SAN DIEGO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Ahmad MESDAQ, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District, Division One.

August 31, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Best Best & Krieger LLP, Bruce W. Beach and Karen F. Landers, San Diego, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Thorsnes Bartolotta & McGuire, Vincent J. Bartolotta, Jr. and Karen F. Frostrom, San Diego; Higgs, Fletcher & Mack LLP and John Morris, San Diego, for Defendant and Appellant.

IRION, J.

In an exercise of its power of eminent domain, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Diego (the Agency) filed proceedings in the superior court to obtain possession of Ahmad Mesdaq's property (a cigar store and coffee shop) and made available to him $3,091,000 as "probable compensation." Mesdaq challenged the Agency's authority to take his property, leading to a series of three trials, two before the trial court and one before a jury. At the conclusion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases