CURTISS v. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS

A130405.

157 P.3d 279 (2007)

212 Or. App. 42

Daniel Gene CURTISS, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Birdie Worley, Rules Coordinator, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 11, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel Gene Curtiss filed the brief pro se.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Denise G. Fjordbeck, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and ROSENBLUM, Judges.


HASELTON, P.J.

Petitioner, an inmate in a Department of Corrections (DOC) facility, challenges the validity of a DOC rule, OAR 291-100-0080, which pertains to DOC's calculation of credit for time served. Petitioner asserts that the rule exceeds the authority of the DOC because it contradicts one of the provisions of ORS 137.370(2). On judicial review of the validity of a rule pursuant to ORS 183.400, we determine whether...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases