1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.3d
  4. 8 N.Y.3d
  5. 8 N.Y.3d 422 (2007)
 

WHITE PLAINS v. CINTAS CORP.

8 N.Y.3d 422 (2007)

867 N.E.2d 381

835 N.Y.S.2d 530

WHITE PLAINS COAT & APRON CO., INC., Appellant, v. CINTAS CORP. et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided April 26, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP (Lee Rubin of the California bar, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel) and Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP, Los Angeles, California (Todd Lundell of counsel), for appellant.

Harris Beach PLLC, Pittsford (A. Vincent Buzard and Laura W. Smalley of counsel), and Keating Muething & Klekamp, PLL (Steven C. Coffaro of the Ohio bar, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel) for respondents.

Judges CIPARICK, GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT and JONES concur.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Chief Judge KAYE.

Plaintiff, White Plains Coat & Apron Co., Inc., is a New York-based linen rental business. Its competitor, defendant Cintas Corp., is a nationwide business that rents similar products to commercial customers. White Plains alleges that it had five-year exclusive service contracts with customers and that, knowing of these arrangements, Cintas nonetheless induced dozens...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases