1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 112 Ohio
  5. 112 Ohio St.3d 309 (2007)
 

BD. OF EDN. v. BD. OF REVISION

No. 2005-1638.

112 Ohio St.3d 309 (2007)

2007-Ohio-6.

STRONGSVILLE BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided January 17, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kolick & Kondzer, Thomas A. Kondzer, and John P. Desimone, for appellants.

Ulmer & Berne, L.L.P., and Richik Sarkar, for appellees, Royalton Investors, L.L.C., Big T Investments, L.L.C., and Ceres Group, Inc.

LANZINGER, J.

{¶ 1} The issue before us is whether the Board of Tax Appeals ("BTA") erred in relying upon appraisal evidence instead of the recent sale price to determine property value for tax purposes. Because its decision was not unreasonable or unlawful, we affirm the BTA's decision.

{¶ 2} This appeal as of right concerns the valuation of real property located...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases