The release signed by plaintiff bars her employment discrimination claims in the action against BTM and O'Neill. Her attempts to void the release are unavailing. First, even if part of the consideration for the release was O'Neill's performance of the postnuptial agreement, and even if he subsequently breached the agreement, a written release is not invalid for lack of consideration (see General Obligations Law § 15-303; Mergler v Crystal Props. Assoc.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ANGEL v. THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI, LTD.
39 A.D.3d 368 (2007)
835 N.Y.S.2d 57
SUSAN ANGEL, Appellant, v. THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI, LTD., et al., Respondents. SUSAN ANGEL, Appellant, v. CHRISTOPHER O'NEILL, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided April 19, 2007.
Decided April 19, 2007.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
