1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 62 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 62 Cal.Rptr.3d 339 (2007)
 

BRANDENBURG v. EUREKA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

No. A114366.

62 Cal.Rptr.3d 339 (2007)

152 Cal.App.4th 1350

Sue C. BRANDENBURG, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. EUREKA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One.

July 2, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neil L. Shapiro, Law Offices of Neil L. Shapiro, Monterey, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Lee C. Rosenthal, Juliet E. Cox, Goldfarb & Lipman LLP, Oakland, for Defendant and Respondent Eureka Redevelopment Agency.

Philip F. Atkins-Pattenson, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP, San Francisco, for Defendants and Respondents Dolores Vellutini and Eureka Waterfront Partners.

STEIN, J.

Sue C. Brandenburg (plaintiff) appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendants Eureka Redevelopment Agency, Eureka Waterfront Partners and Dolores Vellutini (defendants) after the court sustained, without leave to amend, defendants' demurrer to her first amended complaint on the ground that it was filed after the statute of limitations had expired.

We shall affirm the judgment.

FACTS

The original complaint was filed on September...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases