The court's findings were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence established that appellant, with intent to prevent a police officer from performing a lawful duty, caused injury to the officer (Penal Law § 120.05 [3]). There was a sufficiently direct link between appellant's continuous struggle to break free from the officer's hold and the officer's ensuing elbow injury, which occurred when the officer performed...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
