REIFF v. REIFF


40 A.D.3d 346 (2007)

836 N.Y.S.2d 119

CAROL REIFF, Appellant, v. MICHAEL G. REIFF, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided May 15, 2007.


Plaintiff's claim that she is entitled to 66 additional shares of Royal Dutch Shell from the ING brokerage account is without merit. The parties' stipulation of settlement provided that the assets listed on schedule 1 would be divided equally in value; it did not provide that the number of shares would be divided equally. By dividing the value of the account as of a date certain, the agreement protected plaintiff in case Shell shares subsequently declined in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases