The notices of violation were reasonably calculated to apprise interested persons of the proceeding and afford them an opportunity to be heard and to present their objections. No reasonable person would interpret the "hearing penalty" language of the notice, as petitioner does, to state that a penalty will be imposed if the violation is contested, regardless of the outcome of the hearing. Such a reading defies logic and common sense,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
DEXTRA v. CITY OF NEW YORK
46 A.D.3d 328 (2007)
848 N.Y.S.2d 48
FRANTZ DEXTRA, Petitioner, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 13, 2007.
Decided December 13, 2007.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
