The court properly admitted evidence of telephone calls made to two prosecution witnesses on the eve of trial. There was ample proof, including credible voice recognition testimony and circumstantial evidence, to establish that defendant was the maker of the calls (see People v Lynes,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. HAIGLER
44 A.D.3d 329 (2007)
843 N.Y.S.2d 36
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT HAIGLER, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided October 4, 2007.
Decided October 4, 2007.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.