1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 59 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 59 Cal.Rptr.3d 309 (2007)
 

MEYER v. SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P.

No. G037375.

59 Cal.Rptr.3d 309 (2007)

150 Cal.App.4th 1136

Pamela MEYER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

May 16, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Anthony A. Ferrigno, Anthony A. Ferrigno; Franklin & Franklin and J. David Franklin, San Diego, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Reed Smith, Michele Floyd and Raymond A. Cardozo, San Francisco, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

FYBEL, J.

Introduction

Plaintiffs Pamela Meyer and Timothy Phillips, subscribers to defendant Sprint Spectrum L.P.'s (Sprint) cellular telephone service, sued Sprint under the unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof.Code, § 17200 et seq.) (UCL) and the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (Civ.Code, § 1750 et seq.) (CLRA), and sought declaratory relief. Plaintiffs claimed Sprint improperly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases