BARNETT v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY


40 A.D.3d 325 (2007)

835 N.Y.S.2d 183

GUSTAVE BARNETT, Respondent, v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided May 10, 2007.


Under New Jersey case law, which the parties agree controls, the question whether a defendant owes a duty to a plaintiff in tort turns on numerous factors, including the foreseeability of the risk, the parties' relationship (which in this context necessarily entails defendants' observation of existing conditions and the actual performance of the work undertaken by the workers at the site), and the extent to which defendants had the opportunity and capacity to avoid the risk...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases