The trial court's finding that Rosenbaum did not create a nuisance warranting her eviction appears to have been based upon an unreasonable and unsupportable finding that the odors complained of were only occasional and of the type that are unavoidable in close city quarters, an "`inescapable reality of urban life'" (quoting Stiglianese v Vallone,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ZIPPER v. HAROLDON COURT CONDOMINIUM
39 A.D.3d 325 (2007)
835 N.Y.S.2d 43
SHEILA ZIPPER et al., Respondents, v. HAROLDON COURT CONDOMINIUM et al., Appellants, and REBECCA ROSENBAUM, Also Known as REBECCA LUKOWSKY, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided April 17, 2007.
Decided April 17, 2007.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
