Defendant's challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his robbery convictions arising out of his forcible taking of a car is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that these verdicts were based on legally sufficient evidence. We also find that they were not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence supports the conclusion that even if defendant stole the car as a means of transportation...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.