1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 53 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 53 Cal.Rptr.3d 307 (2007)
 

MEDEIROS v. SUPERIOR COURT

No. B193042.

53 Cal.Rptr.3d 307 (2007)

146 Cal.App.4th 1008

Mary MEDEIROS et al., Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, Respondent; Health Net of California et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Seven.

January 16, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Shernoff Bidart & Darras, Michael J. Bidart, Ricardo Echeverria, Claremont; The Ehrlich Law Firm and Jeffrey Isaac Ehrlich for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, Raul L. Martinez and Elise D. Klein, Los Angeles, for Real Parties In Interest.

JOHNSON, J.

In this writ proceeding, petitioners Mary and Lee Medeiros (collectively, Medeiros) challenge the trial court's order compelling them to arbitrate a dispute with their health insurer, real party in interest Health Net.1 Medeiros contends the arbitration provision at issue is unenforceable because it does not comply with the disclosure requirements set forth in Health and Safety Code section 1363.1.2

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases