Plaintiff represents that the parties' depositions were scheduled for January 12, 2006, and argues that defendants' willful failure to produce witnesses deprived him of his right to deposition priority. Defendants do not deny the scheduling of all depositions for January 12, represent that plaintiff's deposition did not conclude until 4:00 P.M., and argue that "[a]ccordingly, no defendant witnesses were produced on that day." Absent a
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
BENNETT v. RIVERBAY CORPORATION
40 A.D.3d 319 (2007)
833 N.Y.S.2d 896
CARL A. BENNETT, Appellant, v. RIVERBAY CORPORATION et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 10, 2007.
Decided May 10, 2007.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
