The motion court properly exercised its discretion in striking third-party defendant's answer pursuant to CPLR 3126 (3) in light of that party's pattern of noncompliance with court orders and discovery demands over a six-year period (see Jones v Green,
Let's get started
![Leagle.com](https://www.leagle.com/images/logo.png)
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.