CRANNEY v. MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW INS. CO.

No. 33501.

175 P.3d 168 (2007)

Arden CRANNEY and Heidi Cranney, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Defendant-Appellant, and Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company of Idaho, an Idaho corporation, Defendant.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Twin Falls, November 2007 Term.

December 24, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cantrill, Skinner, Sullivan & King, LLP, Boise, for appellant. Robert D. Lewis argued.

Hepworth, Lezamiz & Janis Chtd, Twin Falls, for respondent. Robyn Brody argued.


EISMANN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from the district court's refusal to modify an arbitration award by deleting the prejudgment interest awarded by the arbitrator. Because Idaho Code § 7-913(a)(1) does not permit an arbitration award to be modified for a nonmathematical error in awarding prejudgment interest, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On January 29, 2003, Arden Cranney was involved in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases