The action involves two allegedly libelous articles that were published in a teachers' union newsletter and written by defendant, a teacher and union representative at the same high school where plaintiff was an assistant principal. The articles criticized plaintiff's handling of certain disciplinary and school safety issues, and accused him of violating Chancellor's Regulation C-175, which governs "per session" pay and prohibits payment for work that is part of a pedagogue...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.