In this matter, the Court of Appeals has determined that summary judgment dismissing the complaint was not appropriate because "[d]efendants, owners and managers of the premises, failed to establish that they lacked constructive notice of the allegedly defective floor tiles as a matter of law...." (Id. at 910, citing Gordon v American Museum of Natural History,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
LENNARD v. MENDIK REALTY CORP.
43 A.D.3d 279 (2007)
840 N.Y.S.2d 591
MARGO LENNARD, Respondent, v. MENDIK REALTY CORP. et al., Appellants and Third-Party Plaintiffs. CITY OF NEW YORK, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided August 9, 2007.
Decided August 9, 2007.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
