The denial of petitioner's application for a rifle/shotgun permit after revocation of his previous permit was not arbitrary or capricious. Neither the passage of six years nor his recent pursuit of a college education alters the fact that petitioner failed to comply with the rules on handgun licensing by entrusting his weapons to a gun shop in a nonremunerative "sale" rather than surrendering them to the precinct (see Matter of Acosta v Kelly,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
