1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 39 A.D.3d
  5. 39 A.D.3d 267 (2007)
 

CITY CENTER REAL ESTATE, INC. v. BERGER

39 A.D.3d 267 (2007)

833 N.Y.S.2d 75

CITY CENTER REAL ESTATE, INC., Respondent, v. DAVID M. BERGER, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided April 5, 2007.

Although it is true that defendant-appellant as an attorney is authorized to act as a real estate broker under Real Property Law § 442-f, that statute does not confer upon him rights greater than those of a licensed broker, and a licensed broker may not recover a commission based on a cobrokerage agreement involving an unlicensed cobroker (see Real Property Law §§ 442, 442-d; and see Siegel v Henry Fippinger...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases