1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 46 A.D.3d
  5. 46 A.D.3d 252 (2007)
 

ROBINSON v. CRAWFORD

46 A.D.3d 252 (2007)

847 N.Y.S.2d 167

GLORIA ROBINSON, Respondent, v. MOSES CRAWFORD et al., Defendants, and J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, Appellant. GLORIA ROBINSON, Respondent, v. MOSES CRAWFORD et al., Defendants, and PHOUNG QUOC TRAN et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided December 4, 2007.

Contrary to defendants' arguments, plaintiff's claims are not barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel since the Civil Court proceedings in which she previously raised them were disposed of by stipulation (Angel v Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd., 39 A.D.3d 368, 371 [2007]).

Defendants Chase and Finger are correct that plaintiff's cause of action for fraud is not adequately pleaded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases