1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 39 A.D.3d
  5. 39 A.D.3d 258 (2007)
 

ESPINOZA v. CONCORDIA INTERNATIONAL FORWARDING CORP.

39 A.D.3d 258 (2007)

836 N.Y.S.2d 3

GLADYS ESPINOZA, Respondent, v. CONCORDIA INTERNATIONAL FORWARDING CORP., Defendant, and PROFESSIONAL LINE WAREHOUSING INC., Doing Business as PRO LINE WAREHOUSING INC., et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided April 5, 2007.

The motion court improvidently exercised its discretion since Queens County is the site where plaintiff's personal injury claim arose, where plaintiff resides and was treated for her injuries, and where the corporate defendants conduct business (see Ohrenstein v LaGuardia Racquet Club, 118 A.D.2d 515 [1986]; John H. Dair Bldg. Constr. Co. v Mayer, 27 A.D.2d 535 [1966]). The sole connection...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases