MAGYAR v. WEINSTEIN

A126213.

153 P.3d 135 (2007)

211 Or. App. 86

Steven MAGYAR, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Stephanie WEINSTEIN, Respondent-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 14, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Judson M. Carusone, Eugene, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Bromley Newton LLP.

Michael A. Lewis, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and COLLINS, Judge pro tempore.


COLLINS, J. pro tempore.

Respondent1 appeals after the trial court issued a permanent stalking protective order and a preceding temporary stalking protective order. She advances five assignments of error, only three of which we discuss here:

(1) That the court lacked probable cause to issue a temporary stalking protective order;

(2) That the court erred in concluding that a previously issued Family Abuse Prevention Act...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases