The contention raised in this proceeding, that the mandatory imposition upon petitioner of a five-year period of postrelease supervision was illegal, has been previously adjudicated, having been raised by petitioner, and rejected by the sentencing court, in the context of petitioner's motion to vacate his sentence pursuant to CPL 440.20. In deciding the CPL 440.20 motion, the sentencing court specifically held that the challenged aspect of the sentence was not unauthorized...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
